Critique & Humanism | 43 | 2014 | Youth Cultures of Socialism and Post-socialism: Lifestyles, Conformism and Rebellion

issue editors: Tom Junes and Elitza Stanoeva

issue: 43, 1-2/2014

ISSN: 0861-1718

Contents

"Hunters of overseas rags and foreign currency": Stiliagi in the Cold War Soviet Union, 1945-1964

This essay will examine stiliagi, a youth counterculture centered on consuming “western,” especially American, cultural and material products. This paper argues that Soviet “westernized” youth arose as a means of searching for an identity alternative to the heroic veteran, side-stepping offi cial authority, and fashioning a taste-based hierarchy as a means of acquiring social status and power. The stiliagi represented part of a broader wave of postwar spectacular countercultures in both capitalist and socialist contexts, suggesting clear parallels between how developed, industrialized societies reacted to the stresses brought by war and the peacetime transition. Similarly, the societal response to such countercultural youth in both the Soviet Bloc and in western Europe and America combined coercion with co-optation, in general shifting toward the latter by the early 1960s, though the ideological and structural differences explain some divergences in their respective approaches.

Language

Price:

















BG 1.50 EUR

Author: Gleb Tsipursky

Gleb Tsipursky, PhD, is Assistant Professor at the Ohio State University, History Department. He was awarded fellowships by the Kennan Institute, the American Council of Learned Societies, the International Education Program Service, and the International Research and Exchanges Board. His research focuses on the Soviet Union, and he writes about modernity, youth, popular culture, consumption, emotions, the Cold War, globalization, social control, policing, and violence. Among his publications is the brief monograph Having Fun in the Thaw: Youth Initiative Clubs in the Post-Stalin Years (2012). Currently, he is completing a monograph entitled Socialist Fun: Youth, Consumption, and State-Sponsored Popular Culture in the Cold War Soviet Union, 1945-1970. His next planned project is a study on volunteer militias in the USSR and post- Soviet Russia.

Address:
Ohio State University
1179 University Drive
Newark
OH 43055
USA
Email: tsipursky.1@osu.edu

Youth subcultures in Bulgaria in the 1970s and 1980s

The text analyzes the emergence and development of youth subcultures in Bulgaria in the 70s and 80s. It tries to put the problem in a broader context, including various aspects of the attitude of the communist regime to youth in general, the role of the Komsomol in the process, and attempts to control the protest potency among Bulgarian youth. Along with this, it tries to follow the process on the other side of the Iron Curtain – the evolution of the old and new countercultures that are copied, borrowed, but also enriched and domesticated by their followers in Bulgaria. In this sense, the social nature of youth subcultures in Bulgaria remains dualistically divided between imitation and authenticity. Despite this, however, it embodies the authentic rebellion of young people in Bulgaria against the conformism of their parents’ generation, against the oppressive system and against the inertness of life. The article draws parallels with the emergence of major subcultural movements on the West – hippies, rockers, heavy metal fans, punks and wavers – and the subsequent birth of their counterparts in Bulgaria. The approach is historical – anthropological, crossing between archival materials and the fi eldwork of the author in the form of interviews, surveys, external observations. The article ends by tracing the experience of the regime in the years of Gorbachev’s „perestroika“ to look for forms of peaceful coexistence with the subcultures, but also for their domestication and re-education.

Language

Price:

















BG 1.50 EUR

Author: Michail Gruev

Michail Gruev, PhD, is Associate Professor of Contemporary Bulgarian History at the Faculty of History, Sofi a University “St. Kliment Ohridski.” Since 2011, he is head of the department of Bulgarian history. His research interests are in the fi eld of historical anthropology, social history, and minority issues in the Balkans. Among his books (in Bulgarian) are: Reploughed Boundaries. Collectivization and Social Change in Bulgarian Northwest, 1940s-1950s (2009); “The Revival Process”. Muslim Communities and the Communist Regime: Policies, Reactions and Consequences (co-authored with Alexey Kalionski; 2008) and Between the Red Star and the Crescent. The Muslim Bulgarians and the Political Regime, 1944 – 1959 (2003).

Address:
Department of History
Sofi a University “St. Kliment Ohridski”
15 Tsar Osvoboditel Blvd.
1000 Sofi a
Bulgaria
Email: michailgruev@yahoo.com

Mediating subculture: Radio Študent and the late socialist Yugoslav punk

This paper revisits the familiar relationship between the subcultural practices and their discursive media interpretations from two innovative angles. First, it analyzes how this particular dynamic unfolded under specifi c conditions of late socialism. Second, it turns the focus away from the mainstream media and looks closely at a small outlet that emerged around subculture itself. More precisely, I refl ect on the complex role that Ljubljana’s Radio Študent played in the birth and proliferation of the punk subculture that developed in the late 1970s Yugoslavia. After sketching the unique institutional framework within which this medium emerged, I show how the radio’s early coverage of local punk in its most sensitive formative stage helped to forge a wider subculture around it. Radio Študent not only legitimized the new cultural phenomenon, but shaped its meaning on a long run, providing it with strong political connotations that came to dominate all later discussions and perceptions of local punk. Indicatively, the political tone was not one of subversion, but of invigoration, since punk was framed, even if at odds with the reality, as a new socially committed youth lifestyle. Rock critics and promoters that gathered around Radio Študent picked up marginalizing elements of the original punk idiom and insisted on the intrinsic social relevance of its local variant, turning it into an openly politicized movement.

Language

Price:

















BG 1.50 EUR

Author: Marko Zubak

Marko Zubak, PhD in History (Central European University, Budapest), is Research Assistant at the Croatian Institute of History, Zagreb. He is preparing a monograph on the Yugoslav socialist youth press and is currently doing research on socialist disco music. His latest publication is “Culture of the Student Movement” (Časopis za suvremenu povijest 1/2014; in Croatian). His research interests are in the fi elds of media, youth, culture, social movements, socialism.

Address:
Hrvatski institut za povijest
Opatička 10
10000 Zagreb
Croatia
Email: markozubak@hotmail.com

Between political and apolitical: Youth counterculture in communist Poland

This article addresses the role of youth counterculture under Communism in Poland. More precisely, it will focus on some specifi c countercultural movements such as the Bikiniarze, hippies and punks in their historical context as well as briefl y discuss the importance of rock music and the signifi cance of certain fashion trends during the Communist era. Although the appearance of these countercultural youth movements after the Second World War in Poland paid tribute to transnational infl uences – mainly from the West despite the Cold War rift – they also possessed some explicit national characteristics which will be underlined and refl ected on. Despite the fact that these countercultural movements had a relatively small number of adherents, they nonetheless had wider reverberations among respective generations of youth. Moreover, these countercultural movements were de facto apolitical, but since they rejected the offi cially projected and ideologically ‘correct’ youth lifestyle they were perceived by the regime as a political threat. This article therefore argues that youth counterculture in Poland not only represented a mode of resistance to Communist rule by its adherents, but that its infl uence as a consciousness-raising phenomenon among respective generations of youth constituted an impediment for the regime to win over the ‘hearts and minds’ of said generations.

Language

Price:

















BG 1.50 EUR

Author: Tom Junes

Tom Junes, PhD in History (KU Leuven), is Visiting Fellow at the Imre Kertész Kolleg in Jena. He is the author of Student Politics in Communist Poland: Generations of Consent and Dissent (2015). Other recent publications include “Facing the Music: How the Foundations of Socialism Were Rocked in Communist Poland” (Youth and Rock in the Soviet Bloc: Youth Cultures, Music and the State in Russia and Eastern Europe, 2014); “Students Take Bulgaria’s Protests to the Next Level. How the Emerging Student Protest Movement Can Break the Political Stalemate” (Following the Steps of the Other: A Collection in Honor of Maya Grekova, 2014; in Bulg.) and “Poland’s Generation of ’89: Between Rebellion, Ridicule, and the End of History” (Sociological problems 1-2/2014; in Bulg.). His research interests cover Eastern European history, African history, Cold War history, and the history of youth and student movements.

Address:
Imre Kertész Kolleg
Am Planetarium 7
07743 Jena
Germany
Email: junes.tom@gmail.com

"Oceans of pain": The sea as memory and metaphor in Angolan poetry and rap music

The essay examines the way Angolan poets have resorted to images of the Atlantic Ocean as a source of national identity as well as a way of articulating revolt. By focusing on the history of the ocean as a means of transporting slaves from the Angolan coast to the Americas, the poets highlight the negative impact of colonialism on the national territory, presenting the international slave trade as the pivotal experience of destruction – of both identity and memory – that has had repercussions up to our days. On the other hand, the ocean is also the connecting point between African Angolans and their descendants who were spread out by the slave trade all over America and Europe. The same space that features as a source of loss is thus turned into a powerful means of transnational alliance, appealing to ethnic as well as cultural ties between Africans. These images become especially interesting when regarded against the background of the historical and political context in which the poems were composed. Hence, the paper compares poems by famous Angolan authors of the years of struggle for independence from colonialism (the 1960s) and post-colonial socialism (the 70s and 80s) with more contemporary texts by poets/rappers of the current young generation of Angolans, many of whom have adopted the rhetoric of revolution. By allowing the texts to enter into a dialogue with each other, the analysis aims at highlighting the role of the Atlantic as a source of Angolan identity, which itself has undergone signifi cant changes in the past 50 years.

Language

Price:

















BG 1.50 EUR

Author: Ana Sobral

Ana Sobral, PhD, is Assistant Professor of Global Literatures in English at the University of Zurich. Born in Angola, she studied English and German literatures in Portugal and wrote her PhD on American Literature in Germany published as Opting Out: Deviance and Generational Identities in American Post-War Cult Fiction (2012). She is currently doing post-doctoral research on globalization in popular music and working on a book about the new generation of Angolan musicians. Her teaching and research focus on post-colonial literature, globalization studies and popular culture.

Address:
Universität Zürich
Englisches Seminar
Plattenstrasse 47
8032 Zürich
Switzerland
Email: ana.sobralmourao@uzh.ch

The seminars of the 1980s: Between the critical micro-public and verbal action

Discussion with Alexander Kiossev and Deyan Deyanov
moderator – Miglena Nikolchina
participants – Angel Angelov and Andrey Raychev

March 7th, 2014, Plovdiv,

Bulgaria

 

Language

Price:

















BG 1.50 EUR

Participants: Alexander Kiossev and Deyan Deyanov

Deyan Deyanov is Chairman of the International Directors’ Board of the Institute for Critical Social Studies at Plovdiv University “Paisii Hilendarski”. At the same university, he teaches Formal and Philosophical Logics, Logics and Methodology of Human Sciences, Classical and Non-Classical Rationalism, Introduction to Socio-Analysis, Historical Sociology of Economics, and Critical Theory. He is the author of articles whose analysis is situated at the borders between these disciplines and of Introduction in Logics and Methodology of Human Sciences: Human Sciences after the “Death of Man” (2001; in Bulg.). He is the former Director of the Institute for Critical Social Studies and former Editor-in-Chief of Critique & Humanism journal.
Address:
Institute for Critical Social Studies
Plovdiv University “Paisii Hilendarski”
21 Kostaki Peev St.
4000 Plovdiv
Bulgaria
Email: dsdeyanov@yahoo.com

Alexander Kiossev, PhD, is Professor in History of Modern Culture and Director of the Cultural Center of Sofia University “St. Kliment Ohridski.” His research interests are in the spheres of research on reading, cultural history of communist totalitarianism, post-colonial studies and construction of identities. Recently he published the monograph The Quarrels about Reading (2013, in Bulg.). He was editor of the collective volumes “Rules” and “Roles”: Fluid Institutions, Hybrid Roles and Identities in East European Transformation Processes (1989–2005) (co-edited with Pеtya Kabakchieva, 2009) and Post-Theory, Games and Discursive Resistance (1995). Since 2000 he has headed several international and national research projects dedicated to the Balkan cultures, reading problems and autobiographies about the period of communism.
Address:
Department of Cultural Studies
Faculty of Philosophy
Sofia University “St. Kliment Ohridski”
15 Tsar Osboboditel Blvd
1000 Sofia
Bulgaria
Email: akiossev@gmail.com

Beyond resistance: Some reflections on Russian street youth

The paper analyzes the accounts of the members of street gangs in Russia in the late Soviet period and at a time of transition to capitalism. It argues that resistance to law and authority among troublesome youth does not preclude them from sharing dominant ideologies and identifying with the normative majority.

Language

Price:

















BG 1.50 EUR

Author: Svetlana Stephenson

Svetlana Stephenson is Reader in Sociology at London Metropolitan University. She had worked at the Russian Centre for Public Opinion Research (Levada Centre), and was Leverhulme Visiting Research Fellow at the University of Essex. She holds a Candidate of Sociology degree from the Institute of Sociology, the Russian Academy of Sciences. She is the author of Crossing the Line. Vagrancy, Homelessness and Social Displacement in Russia (2006) and co-editor of Youth and Social Change in Eastern Europe and the Former Soviet Union (co-edited with Charles Walker; 2012). Her other publications include “The Violent Practices of Youth Territorial Groups in Moscow” (Europe-Asia Studies 64:1/2012) and “The Kazan Leviathan. Russian Street Gangs as Agents of Social Order” (The Sociological Review 59:2/2011). Her current research interests are in the fi eld of gang studies.

Address:
Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
London Metropolitan University
166-220 Holloway Road
London N7 8DB
United Kingdom
Email: s.stephenson@londonmet.ac.uk

Appropriations of urban space as resistance: The Soviet army monument in Sofia

The Soviet Army Monument in Sofi a has been a topic of a variety of social debates and discords for decades. While some focus on its meaning and location in the city center, arguing about its potential removal, new generations use the place, ascribing new meanings and interpretations. Confronting the power discourse, civil initiatives such as gay prides, marijuana decriminalization events and electronic dance music „street parades” use the symbolic meaning of the place to claim regard of the human rights and the freedom of expression. On the other hand, it has evolved as a medium for street art’s social criticism and contemporary art actions, focused on broader issues such as the conscious use of public space by citizens and provoking public debates on the contemporary way of living in the city. Meanwhile, young citizens have been transforming the space in a more casual way through everyday practices like hanging out, practicing urban sports and partying. All these appropriations reinterpret the monument and the surrounding park, converting it into a place of freedom, alternative lifestyles and anti-consumerism. The uses of the public space as an act of resistance reconcile social and political consciousness and leisure in a bottom-up search for “humane” places created by people for people.

Language

Price:

















BG 1.50 EUR

Author: Kristina Dimitrova

Kristina Dimitrova is BA in Cultural Studies and is currently studying in the MA Program in Urban Studies at the Sociology Department of Sofi a University “St. Kliment Ohridski.” Her research interests include urban anthropology, uses of public space, youth cultures, social movements, protest, and new media. The current text is based on a study conducted in 2011 and concerns the graffiti action “Abreast with the times” that transformed a sculpture group of Soviet soldiers into American superheroes.
Email: dimitrova.kr@gmail.com

Politics of space: The #ДАНСwithme protest movement on the stage of post-socialist Sofia

#ДАНСwithme is the longest lasting anti-government protest in the history of Bulgaria. Acting as a temporary intervention into the urban fabric of Sofia, it was a battle for the access to ‘truth’ in the public sphere. Through it, a particular discursive critique and practical critical ethos were developed, which were aimed at uncovering the overarching relations of power and dominant systems of truth hidden behind the regime of façade democracy. It is argued in this paper that #ДАНСwithme functioned as a specific kind of diagnosis of the present because it generated distinct battles for the access to truth both about the present through the past and about the present through the future.

Language

Price:

















BG 1.50 EUR

Author: Nikolay Nikolov

Nikolay Nikolov holds BA in International Studies with Political Science from the University of Birmingham, Msc in Political Sociology from the London School of Economics, and MRes in Politics and Economics of Eastern Europe from the University College London, where he is currently a PhD student in Politics. He is also working as a journalist for Al Jazeera and previously he has worked as a producer for the New York Public Radio and an editor for openDemocracy. His research focuses on the role architecture in the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe exerts on subjectivities and identities both before and after 1989 as well as the impact of socialist regimes in Eastern Europe on the post-socialist period, the discursive practices and power structures inherited from totalitarianism.

Address:
Research cluster
School of Slavonic and Eastern European Studies
University College London
Gower Street
London WC1E 6BT
United Kingdom
Email: nikolay.nikolov@aljazeera.net

The 2013 university occupation: Searching for meaning

The text is a critical examination of three interpretations of the 2013 student occupation that took place in Sofi a University and other universities. The first positions it within the framework of the so-called “summer protests”, triggered by the appointment of a controversial media mogul as chief of national security, though it also develops its own messages and practices. The second interprets the occupation as a critique of that same protest, while the third rationalizes it as a relatively successful attempt to build an “autonomous student republic”, with little to do with the wave of protests that hit the country in 2013. The text is mostly devoted to the last two interpretations, as the author fi nds the first well supported by the events. The second, it is argued, piggybacks on influential critiques of the wave of protests that hit the world after 2008, so the strategy of the author here is to criticize it by defl ating those infl uential critiques. The third is critically appreciated on its own merits. It offers an ex post facto rationalization of the events with “ontological” claims, reducing the multifaceted character of the student occupation to fi t a highly ideological construct – autonomism, as its single meaning. The autonomism thesis is criticized as depraving the events of their vital context, as misinterpreting the organization and character of the autonomous decision-making of collective bodies and as attributing single ideology to a diverse student body, with diverse motivations and ideological commitments.

Language

Price:

















BG 1.50 EUR

Author: Ruzha Smilova

Ruzha Smilova, PhD, is Senior Assistant Professor at the Political Science Department of Sofia University “St. Kliment Ohridski,” where she teaches History of Political Ideas and Contemporary Political Philosophy. She is also Program Director (political research) at the Centre for Liberal Strategies – Sofia. She graduated in Philosophy at Sofi a University and holds a doctoral degree in Political Science from the Central European University in Budapest with a dissertation on A Reason-based Justifi cation for Liberal-Democratic Authority. Her academic interests are in moral, political and legal philosophy with a focus on the issues of the authority of democracy, political duty, the relation media-democracy and contemporary theories of justice. Her recent publications include: “Тhe General Will Constitution: Rousseau as a Constitutionalist” (Constitutionalism and the Classics, 2014), “Jeremy Waldron on Dignity and Responsibility-Rights: Can the Tragedy of Liberty be Avoided?“ (Freedom and Its Enemies: The Tragedy of Liberty, 2014).

Address:
Political Science Department
Sofi a University “St. Kliment Ohridski”
125 Tzarigradsko shosse, block 4
1112 Sofia
Bulgaria
Еmail: ruzha.smilova@gmail.com

Banitza

A self-presentation of the youth online magazine Banitza provided by two
of its editors.

Language

Price:

















BG 1.50 EUR

Authors: Raya Raeva and Nikolay Nikolov

Nikolay Nikolov holds BA in International Studies with Political Science from the University of Birmingham, Msc in Political Sociology from the London School of Economics, and MRes in Politics and Economics of Eastern Europe from the University College London, where he is currently a PhD student in Politics. He is also working as a journalist for Al Jazeera and previously he has worked as a producer for the New York Public Radio and an editor for openDemocracy. His research focuses on the role architecture in the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe exerts on subjectivities and identities both before and after 1989 as well as the impact of socialist regimes in Eastern Europe on the post-socialist period, the discursive practices and power structures inherited from totalitarianism.
Address:
Research cluster
School of Slavonic and Eastern European Studies
University College London
Gower Street
London WC1E 6BT
United Kingdom
Email: nikolay.nikolov@aljazeera.net

 

Raya Raeva is an undergraduate student of Philosophy at Sofi a University “St. Kliment Ohridski.” She is interested in exploring notions of the postsocialist society relating to the place and space of those born after the fall of the Berlin Wall, as well as the discursive and language practices of conversation and dialogue between generations.
Email: rayaraeva@gmail.com

Behind Marx's hidden abode: For an extended conception of capitalism

A lecture of Nancy Fraser published in New Left Review and reprinted here with the journal’s permission.

Language

Price:

















BG 1.50 EUR

Author: Nancy Fraser

Nancy Fraser, PhD, is Henry A. and Louise Loeb Professor of Political and Social Science at the New School for Social Research in New York. She works on contemporary critical and feminist theory. Her work builds a comprehensive theory of justice, containing three basic dimensions: redistribution, recognition and political representation. She is the author of Fortunes of Feminism: From State-Managed Capitalism to Neoliberal Crisis (2013); Scales of Justice: Reimagining Political Space in a Globalizing World (2008); Redistribution or Recognition? A Political-Philosophical Exchange (co-authored with Axel Honneth, 2003); The Radical Imagination: Between Redistribution and Recognition (2003); Justice Interruptus: Critical Refl ections on the „Postsocialist” Condition (1997); Feminist Contentions: A Philosophical Exchange (co-authored with Seyla Benhabib, Judith Butler, and Drucilla Cornell, 1994); Unruly Practices: Power, Discourse, and Gender in Contemporary Social Theory (1989).

Address:
New School for Social Research
6 East 16th Street, Room 714
New York
NY 10003
USA
Email: FraserN@earthlink.net

Parity: The grammar of contestation and its readings and misreadings by the protests

Interview with Nancy Fraser by Dimitar Vatsov

Dartmouth College, May 8th, 2014

 

Language

Price:

















BG 1.50 EUR

Authors: Nancy Fraser and Dimitar Vatsov

Nancy Fraser, PhD, is Henry A. and Louise Loeb Professor of Political and Social Science at the New School for Social Research in New York. She works on contemporary critical and feminist theory. Her work builds a comprehensive theory of justice, containing three basic dimensions: redistribution, recognition and political representation. She is the author of Fortunes of Feminism: From State-Managed Capitalism to Neoliberal Crisis (2013); Scales of Justice: Reimagining Political Space in a Globalizing World (2008); Redistribution or Recognition? A Political-Philosophical Exchange (co-authored with Axel Honneth, 2003); The Radical Imagination: Between Redistribution and Recognition (2003); Justice Interruptus: Critical Refl ections on the „Postsocialist” Condition (1997); Feminist Contentions: A Philosophical Exchange (co-authored with Seyla Benhabib, Judith Butler, and Drucilla Cornell, 1994); Unruly Practices: Power, Discourse, and Gender in Contemporary Social Theory (1989).
Address:
New School for Social Research
6 East 16th Street, Room 714
New York
NY 10003
USA
Email: FraserN@earthlink.net

 

Dimitar Vatsov, PhD in Philosophy (Sofi a University “St. Kliment Ohridski”), is Associate Professor of Philosophy at New Bulgarian University, Sofi a. He is Editor-in-Chief of Critique & Humanism journal and President of the Human and Social Studies Foundation – Sofi a. He is the author of the following books (in Bulgarian): Essays on Power and Truth (2009); Freedom and Recognition: The Interactive Sources of Identity (2006); Ontology of Affi rmation: Nietzsche as a Task (2003). His research interests are in the fi elds of political philosophy, especially critical theory, and post-analytic philosophy of language.
Address:
New Bulgarian University
Department of Philosophy and Sociology
21 Montevideo Blvd
1618 Sofi a
Bulgaria
Email: dvatsov@gmail.com

Critical theory after the end of progress: Contextualism, de-colonization and politics

nterview with Amy Allen by Dimitar Vatsov

Dartmouth College, June 4th, 2014

 

Language

Price:

















BG 1.50 EUR

Authors: Amy Allen and Dimitar Vatsov

Amy Allen, PhD, teaches at Dartmouth College since 1997, after receiving her PhD in Philosophy from Northwestern University. Her research and teaching interests are in continental philosophy, with a particular emphasis on the intersection of critical social theory, post-structuralism, and feminist theory. She has published widely on the topics of power, subjectivity, agency, and autonomy in the work of Foucault, Habermas, Butler, and Arendt. Her publications include two books: The Politics of Our Selves: Power, Autonomy, and Gender in Contemporary Critical Theory (2008) and The Power of Feminist Theory: Domination, Resistance, Solidarity (1999). She is Co-Editor of the journal Constellations: An International Journal of Critical and Democratic Theory, Series Editor of the Columbia University Press book series New Directions in Critical Theory, and Executive Co-Director of the Society for Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy (SPEP).
Address:
Department of Philosophy
Dartmouth College
6035 Thornton Hall
Hanover
NH 03755
USA
Email: amy.r.allen@dartmouth.edu

Dimitar Vatsov, PhD in Philosophy (Sofia University “St. Kliment Ohridski”), is Associate Professor of Philosophy at New Bulgarian University, Sofi a. He is Editor-in-Chief of Critique & Humanism journal and President of the Human and Social Studies Foundation – Sofia. He is the author of the following books (in Bulgarian): Essays on Power and Truth (2009); Freedom and Recognition: The Interactive Sources of Identity (2006); Ontology of Affi rmation: Nietzsche as a Task (2003). His research interests are in the fi elds of political philosophy, especially critical theory, and post-analytic philosophy of language.
Address:
New Bulgarian University
Department of Philosophy and Sociology
21 Montevideo Blvd
1618 Sofia
Bulgaria
Email: dvatsov@gmail.com

Narratives on the Bulgarian apocalypse

Thе article aims at analyzing the apocalyptic narratives on present-day Bulgaria, which in the last years of the economic and fi nancial crisis enjoy increasing media popularity and tend even to become the dominant analytical discourse in Bulgarian media. The main thesis of the article is that the apocalyptic narratives constitute a kind of discourse viruses that threaten to diminish considerably our cognitive capacities as well as to restrict our practical capacities. That is why we should decisively oppose their unimpeded dissemination. The analysis is focused on three types of apocalyptic narratives: 1) narratives that explain the stated ill-fortunes of the country through conspiracy theories, more precisely through a plot of external and/or internal enemies willing to demolish Bulgaria; 2) narratives that ascribe our failures to an insurmountable cultural or mental insuffi ciency of Bulgarian people; 3) narratives that ascribe our calamities to equally insurmountable divisions of the nation − on the level of values, mentality or social status − that obstruct the possibility of any positive development.

Language

Price:

















BG 1.50 EUR

Author: Boyan Znepolski

Boyan Znepolski is Associate Professor at the Department of Sociology, Sofia University “St. Kliment Ohridski.” He is the author of the monographs (in Bulgarian): The Limits of the Subject (2007) and Hermeneutic Paradigms (2004). He is a member of the Editorial Board of Critique and Humanism journal. He is editor of “People” and “Civil Society” as Resources of Democracy (Critique and Humanism 41, special issue 2013) and co-editor with Dimitar Vatsov of Rethinking Democracy. Power and Resistance (Critique and Humanism 38, 1/2012).

Address:
Department of Sociology
Sofi a University “St. Kliment Ohridski”
125 Tsarigradsko Shose, block 4
1113 Sofia
Bulgaria
Email: bznepolski@hotmail.com